首页> 外文OA文献 >Identification of acute myocardial infarction from electronic healthcare records using different disease coding systems: A validation study in three European countries
【2h】

Identification of acute myocardial infarction from electronic healthcare records using different disease coding systems: A validation study in three European countries

机译:使用不同的疾病编码系统从电子医疗记录中识别急性心肌梗塞:在三个欧洲国家的验证研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

textabstractObjective: To evaluate positive predictive value (PPV) of different disease codes and free text in identifying acute myocardial infarction (AMI) from electronic healthcare records (EHRs). Design: Validation study of cases of AMI identified from general practitioner records and hospital discharge diagnoses using free text and codes from the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC), International Classification of Diseases 9th revision-clinical modification (ICD9-CM) and ICD-10th revision (ICD-10). Setting: Population-based databases comprising routinely collected data from primary care in Italy and the Netherlands and from secondary care in Denmark from 1996 to 2009. Participants: A total of 4 034 232 individuals with 22 428 883 person-years of follow-up contributed to the data, from which 42 774 potential AMI cases were identified. A random sample of 800 cases was subsequently obtained for validation. Main outcome measures: PPVs were calculated overall and for each code/free text. 'Best-case scenario' and 'worst-case scenario' PPVs were calculated, the latter taking into account non-retrievable/non-assessable cases. We further assessed the effects of AMI misclassification on estimates of risk during drug exposure. Results: Records of 748 cases (93.5% of sample) were retrieved. ICD-10 codes had a 'best-case scenario' PPV of 100% while ICD9-CM codes had a PPV of 96.6% (95% CI 93.2% to 99.9%). ICPC codes had a 'best-case scenario' PPV of 75% (95% CI 67.4% to 82.6%) and free text had PPV ranging from 20% to 60%. Corresponding PPVs in the 'worst-case scenario' all decreased. Use of codes with lower PPV generally resulted in small changes in AMI risk during drug exposure, but codes with higher PPV resulted in attenuation of risk for positive associations. Conclusions: ICD9-CM and ICD-10 codes have good PPV in identifying AMI from EHRs; strategies are necessary to further optimise utility of ICPC codes and free-text search. Use of specific AMI disease codes in estimation of risk during drug exposure may lead to small but significant changes and at the expense of decreased precision.
机译:目的:评估不同疾病代码和自由文本在从电子医疗记录(EHR)识别急性心肌梗死(AMI)中的阳性预测值(PPV)。设计:使用来自国际基层医疗分类(ICPC),国际疾病分类第9版-临床修改(ICD9-CM)和ICD-的自由文本和代码从全科医生记录和出院诊断中识别出的AMI病例进行验证研究。第10版(ICD-10)。地点:基于人群的数据库,包括从1996年至2009年从意大利和荷兰的初级保健以及丹麦的二级保健中定期收集的数据。参与者:总计4,034232人,随访22,428,883人年根据数据,从中识别出42774例潜在的AMI病例。随后获得了800个病例的随机样本进行验证。主要结果度量:分别针对每个代码/自由文本计算了PPV。计算了“最佳情况”和“最坏情况”的PPV,后者考虑了不可回收/不可评估的情况。我们进一步评估了AMI错误分类对药物暴露期间风险估计的影响。结果:检索到748例记录(占样本的93.5%)。 ICD-10代码的“最佳情况” PPV为100%,而ICD9-CM代码的PPV为96.6%(95%CI为93.2%至99.9%)。 ICPC代码的“最佳情况” PPV为75%(95%CI为67.4%至82.6%),自由文本的PPV为20%至60%。在“最坏情况”下,相应的PPV均下降。使用PPP较低的代码通常会导致药物暴露期间AMI风险的微小变化,但是使用PPV较高的代码会减少正向联想的风险。结论:ICD9-CM和ICD-10代码在从EHR识别AMI中具有良好的PPV。进一步优化ICPC代码和自由文本搜索效用的策略是必不可少的。在估计药物暴露期间的风险中使用特定的AMI疾病代码可能会导致微小但显着的变化,但会降低精度。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号